The Presidency of the United States of America

Dear Friend:

I have declared my candidacy for the Presidency of the United States and I am hereby
asking you to help me as I seek to lead a revolution to take back our government from
the special interests that have been manipulating it for their benefit, at our expense,
for too long now.

The central tenet of my campaign is respect for the life of all Americans, regardless of
their age. This idea is central to the founding of our country and central to the very
principal of civilization that every person’s life is of equal value and deserves equal
protection under the law.

I believe that life begins at conception. The person, formed at conception is just as
deserving of protection and just as important as you, or me. For 42 years now, our
country has allowed a policy of a quiet genocide, whereby over 60 million Americans
have died at the hands of abortionists. It is time that we end this American tragedy.
My election will end abortion once and for all. I will only qualify for the Office of
President, by measuring my life from Conception, not from birth, and by winning
the office, I will irrefutably define Life, as beginning at conception, overturning
Roe v Wade and abolishing abortion.

Economically speaking, we must create opportunity for all Americans to better
themselves and create prosperous future for themselves through diligence and hard
work. My tax proposal will do exactly that. It is called the “Five Year New Income Tax Holiday”. Just as its title says, it will establish a five year holiday on any new income
realized by any American above and beyond that which they have earned in the baseline income year. This policy will encourage hard work and diligent pursuit of economic advancement for all Americans, equally.

President Theodore Roosevelt was a man who I deeply admire. He was convinced that
the government sanctioned monopolies of the railroads must provide equal benefit to
all Americans. At a time when US Steel and Standard Oil Company were able to buy all
of the freight at wholesale rates, making it unaffordable for a small business owner to purchase freight from the railroads, President Roosevelt demanded that the “little man”
be treated fairly by the railroad who had regulated monopolies. The modern healthcare market is similar. While the vast majority of healthcare services are being purchased by
a large provider such as Blue Cross or United Healthcare at deeply discounted rates, an uninsured individual can not walk in a receive the same healthcare services for the same prices as these government regulated monopolies. That is not right! The individual
citizen should certainly receive the same prices for his services as the government
regulated provider, just the same as the small business should have been given
affordable freight rates when US Steel and Standard Oil were controlling the freight
market.

I have proposed a foreign policy of partnering with our allies around the world, and
then with the moderate leaders in Middle East, who are working to create a peaceful
and prosperous future for their people, such as King Abdullah of Jordan, to defeat ISIL
and the radical terrorist ideology of islamic jihadism once and for all. In order to do so,
we must attack them militarily and build the economies of our allies through trade so
that the people of those nations will begin to understand how working with the
United States is good for them, their families and their countries.

For years, I have advocated a more protectionist trade policy. In some cases, we should
levy tariffs on the exportation of raw materials and duties on the importation of finished goods. This would encourage the manufacturing sector to grow domestically, which is
critical. Free Trade has had devastating effects on the manufacturing sector and the
working class in the United States of America. Free trade policies have given economic advantages to many foreign nations, at the expense of the American People. This must change. If we are going to participate in free trade in the future, we must demand that the other parties tot he contracts, have equivalent environmental and labor regulations to those in the United States.

I propose to use the “bully pulpit” of the Presidency to force Congress to act to declare
public homosexual acts illegal. The radical homosexual agenda is becoming more and
more prevalent. Many Americans do not want to have the homosexual lifestyle pushed
on them by the media and the homosexual activists and we are being forced to suffer
what we consider a very vulgar conduct, which is spreading through our culture in a
very concerning way. I propose to end this by declaring it illegal to engage publicly in
homosexual conduct on the grounds that such conduct is a threat to the culture and
the very well being of our nation.

I propose to pay off the debt by downsizing the federal government and unleashing
the productivity of the American People. I will eliminate major departments in the
federal government, including the EPA, Department of Education and the
Department of Energy. These bureaucracies are a tremendous waste of American
taxpayer dollars, they are costing us billions to operate, which we do not have, and
the States, are quite capable of handling the regulatory responsibilities of each of
them. I will work with Congress to systematically defund these departments and
agencies and demolish the buildings in which they are housed. These buildings
will be replaced with lovely parks which will significantly improve the beauty of our
nation’s capitol and will significantly reduce the burden it puts on the backs of
American workers and businesses. These parks will be protected in perpetuity by Conservation Easements, which will be given to various land trusts.

I will close the IRS. The responsibility for tax collection will be remanded to the
states or to private companies, in the event the states will not agree to participate.
I am convicted by the principal the the Constitution gives the federal government
very limited responsibility. I will be guided by my love of God and my respect for
the Constitution, for which so much has been sacrificed.

I will build our military and make it the preeminent power in the world again. I will
equip our soldiers, sailors and marines in such a way that they will never be put into
harm’s way without the very best equipment that money can buy. I will never put
them into harm’s way without knowing what the goal is, what it means to win and
how we can win. I will not go to war without a declaration of war from Congress,
unless war has been declared upon the United States or any of our allies, in which
case, I would leverage our assets to defeat those who threaten us as swiftly as possible.
We should double the number of ships in our navy in ten years, increase our
intelligence presence around the world and once again strengthen our defense system
to the most powerful the world has ever seen.

Finally and perhaps most importantly, I will honor our veterans and provide them
with the care that they deserve. I will appoint an Executive Liason in every state
whose sole responsibility is to make sure that every veteran is receiving the benefits
and the care he or she was promised when he signed up. This person will be charged
with the responsibility of meeting with members of Congress and the military
leadership of every State, to ensure that not one veteran is slipping through the
cracks. When we needed them they were there for us, now it is our turn to be there
for them. I mean that and I will do it.

I ask for your support. Humbly, I ask. I am concerned about the direction of our
country. I am concerned for my children’s future and that of your children, too. I am perplexed by why it is that there is NO ONE on the debate stage who understands or
has been through the same challenges faced by the VAST MAJORITY of Americans
in the last eight years. Statistically, that does not compute. Why is there not one, who
has experienced the same challenges the rest of us have in the last eight years? It is
because the game is rigged. It is time to CHANGE THE GAME for the Better! For the
People! For the Future!

Thank you, I ask you sincerely for your support, for your commitment, for your
prayers and for your vote.

If you support what I am standing for, I ask you to join the founders of my campaign
and immediately send a check for $500, made out to Daniel Dyas for President 2016
to 23210 Highway 98, Fairhope, AL 36532.

Humbly in service to all,

Daniel Dyas

Daniel Dyas Cleared of Fraudulent Domestic Violence Allegations

See Article Here! 

Events Transpiring Quickly in Egypt

I am getting very upset by what is happening in Egypt. It is time for the United States/ Barrack Obama to quit meddling in the business of this ally. President Mumbarak has heard the people in the streets and has heeded thier calls for his ouster by agreeing to not seek reelection. Ok, that was easy. I love it when the leaders listen to a popular uprising of the people. I haven't seen it happen here in the United States that often. But to Mr. Mumbarak's credit- he did. Good for him.

The strange thing is that now that he has made that commitment, the formerly peaceful demonstrations in Cairo have erupted into violent clashes in the streets. Greg Palkot of Fox News and his camera man, Olaf Wiig, were violently beaten two days ago as they tried to make thier way out of the city. Thank God they survived. Mr. Wiig described moments when he wondered if they would be the last of his life and likened the appearance of his back to "a piece of modern art" (maybe not the best analogy) from all of the cuts and bruises he recieved as he and Palkot tried to get out of Liberation Square with thier lives. The two men said that they were in the streets (apparently trying to leave) when they found themselves being accosted by a mob of people. Mr. Wiig thought quickly and said he looked for a person in the crowd who was clearly appalled by the violence. When he found that person, he grabbed onto his or her lapels and begged for help. He then commenced to lowering his head and pushing his way through the crowd, using his sympathizer as a sort of human shield. Palkot followed.

If the United States should have any involvement in the events transpiring in Egypt in the near future, it should consist of finding the man who helped these Western journalists (Palkot being American) get to safety and giving him a Medal of Honor. His actions deserve to be commended with the full esteem of the United States of America. By helping these men get to safety, he put his own life in danger and that of his family. These are the sort of people who are our allies. Not the ones throwing molitof coctails.

What happened next is most interesting and has been terribly underreported in the media. Pro-Mumbarak forces put the two journalists in the back of a jeep and got them out of the area. They were quickly blindfolded (because they were suspected of being spies) and carried to what I understood to be a police station of sorts. After having thier photos taken they were put in another vehicle and carried out of the city and to safety.

Unfortunately and to my extreme disappointlment, this event was terribly mischaracterized by many in the press, none more notable than the usually respectable Sean Hannity. I am disappointed in Hannity's reporting of the event because, to me it seemed to be a clear misprepresentation of the truth. Hannity said that "Palkot and Wigg had been attacked by Pro-Mumbarak protesters" and by saying that he misled millions of people about the truth as it exists in Egypt right now. The fact is, according to the interview of the two men, they were rescued by Pro-Mumbarak forces, and at least one hero who happened to be in the streets and came to thier aide.

The fact is: 90% of the injuries sustained were to thier backs and the backs of thier heads. As they pushed thier ways through the crowd of demostrators, they describered being continually beaten, punched, slapped, cut and stabbed. The perpetrators of these acts were the violent protesters, likely sympathisers of the muslim brotherhood. There is no way to tell who they were or what thier motives were, because both Palcot and Wiig had thier heads down and were bent over at the waist as they forced thier way through the unruly crowd. When they reached the safety of the Mumbarak forces, they were taken safely away and according to thier first hand account: treated relatively well and helped to escape the country.

Mr. Hannity should correct his comment from last night. These sorts of inaccuracies in reporting can shape public opinion based on false information and can be terribly destructive.

The situation as I understand it is as follows. There was a peaceful popular uprising demanding governmental reform and the ouster of President Mumbarak. He sent the military out to keep the peace, which they did succesfully. The cries from the streets became so loud that the whole world began to take note and President Mumbarak agreed that he, nor his son, would not seek reelection in this year's Presidential election. By this time, Prsident Obama and Hillary Clinton have each sent a half dozen different mixed signals about what our policy would be, Obama even going so far as calling for the President to step down. Hillary Clinton took a better, (although still questionable) approach and said we "want to see a predictable and peaceful transition to a new administration." Does that mean that the United States wants to choose the new President of Egypt? I don't know, but "predictable", somewhat implies that does it not?

It is too bad that Barrack Obama has to be such an idiot. He has really created a tremendous quagmire over there, in that he has lost all trust that President Mumbarak may have had in our Administration. We should have been behind him, quietly, as he agreed to not seek reelection. The protesters went home in large part at that point and many of them even came out in support of him. I can imagine that many of them came out to say "OK, Everybody, he has agreed not to run again! Let's not let this conflict fester to the point of civil war! Go home and we'll have an election in the fall!" That is exactly what I would have been saying anyway. But, no, Barrack just couldn't let it be. He had to call for an immediate departure from office and special elections to fill the office.

It is no coinicidence that about a week after the demonstrations began and just as soon as they began to subside following Mumbarak's announcement of not seeking reelection, the muslim brotherhood showed up on the scene and began instigating violence in the streets. The muslim brotherhood wants the violence to expand so that there will be an emergency election and in the chaos, one of thier own will likely gain control of the country.

The right way to handle the situation at this point is for the United States to reassure Mumbarak that we are behind him through the rest of his term and quietly encourage him to hush the muslim brotherhood as they try to instigate further violence. Of course, our President (a muslim sympathizer himself) would not ever do such a thing. He would not think of encouraging Mumbarak to remain in office and to quiet the muslim brotherhood extremists who have taken over the demonstrations, but he should.

If we could achieve this, the violence will subside and there will be a peaceful election in the fall. If the muslim brotherhood continues to perpetrate violence against its own people, the Egyptian people will be smart enough to see who is terrorizing them in thier own home, and the muslim brotherhood will be denied in its bid for power come fall. Now that is an orderly and predictable transition. There is no reason we should advoctate the circumvention of Egypt's Constituion and its electoral proces and in doing so give the muslim extremits a change to gain a stranglehold on Egypt, our ally's, government. That would be an  immeasurable blow to American and the entire Western World's interests worldwide for decades to come.

Truly,
J. Daniel Dyas

Pray for those affected by the heartless actions taken in Tucson, Arizona on January 8, 2011

Tragedy Strikes in Tucson, Arizona

On Saturday morning, the peace of beautiful Tucson, Arizona was violently broken with the sound of gun fire as a maddened man who deserves no further mention took out his apparent rage on Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and a crowd who had gathered for a meeting with their congresswoman. There were six killed in the attack and numerous others injured. Congresswoman Giffords, the target of the attack, remains in critical condition.

Among those killed was a precious nine year old little girl, who had come to learn about our country's government. It is absolutely heart breaking to hear this. This little girl was so innocent (as were all of the victims) and it is unimaginable that someone would want to hurt such a precious thing as a beautiful little girl.

Also killed was a pastor, a man who gave his life to the service of our Lord. What a shame. One can only assume that he is now enjoying his eternal reward. Lord, rest his soul.

Another of the fatalities was that of United States District Judge John McCarthy Roll. Judge Roll was by all accounts a wonderful man. He was a conservative judge who has devoted his life to the service of his fellow man through his devotion to justice. I know that Judge Roll was a Fourth Degree Knight of Columbus, meaning he was Catholic and devoted to the pricnipals of Life and family. It saddens me greatly that we have lost such a wonderful man. There are too few like him and he will be missed greatly by many, many people.

I pray that Representative Giffords recovers from her injuries and is able to return to her service in our nation's capital. It has been reported by many of her colleagues, on both sides of the aisle, that she is a devoted public servant who spends countless hours working to meet the needs of her constituents and has a unique ability to work productively with all of her colleagues, regardless of party affiliation. I pray for her speedy recovery.

Considering the extent of her injuries, I am amazed and inspired at how well she appears to be doing according to the reports being released through the University of Arizona Medical Center. I was most impressed by Dr. Rhee and the Medical Staff at the University Medical Center yesterday with thier handling of the number of cases they had, particularly considering the severity of many of them. They have been perfectly professional in the handling of the situation, and the work they have performed on Congresswoman Giffords has resulted in a (however early) recovery that is nothing short of miraculous. God is capable of anything and sometimes he uses people to do His work. In this case I believe beyond any doubt that He has guided these doctors and granted them the healing touch that they needed to save Gabrielle Giffords.

In closing I will say that it saddenes me greatly to see violence in our streets, anytime, particularly so when it involves circumstances such as this. Our nation was founded by some of the bravest men in the history of mankind. They stood up to tyranny so that we could enjoy peace and prosperity. They were wise enough to bequeath to us a beautifully crafted system of government which, given the willingness and the interest of the People, there need not ever be another day of civil unrest on this country's soil. Violence is not the answer. It achieves nothing. Love, faith and mutual respect are the answer.

Yes, we must fight to protect our freedoms and regain those we have lost. At the same time, we must repudiate disgusting acts of violence such as the one we witnessed this weekend. Our founding fathers laid down thier lives for our freedom, to ensure that given the wherewithall we need never see another day of bloodshed in this great nation. For us to not be involved in our government is to not be appreciative of that sacrifice which they so magnanamously made for us.

Thomas Jefferson, one of the greatest among them is remembered as saying:

"The greatest threat to our viable republic is a disinterested citizenry."

Not that this quote needs any interpretation, but in other words: If our nation is to survive in its intended form, we, the people, must be involved in our government. It is not someone else's responsibility. It is yours and it is mine.

That is why I ran for office. That is why you should consider running for office. It takes US. It is not some unattainable class of ruling elite, who should be running our nation's government. It is everyday people like you and me.

That is what saddens me most about the tragedy that took place on Saturday morning in Tucson, Arizona. The lives which were ended and those that were affected were people just like us. They were also people who cared enough about thier country to get involved in its government. They were people who got up on Saturday morning to go meet thier Congresswoman. They were people who had devoted thier lives to the service of others. And worse yet, some were people whose lives had barely even gotten started yet.

It is a tragedy. I pray the People of The United States will truly begin to take an active interest in our government. If that happens, mutual respect will begin to blossom and we will see a shift in policy away from the stalemate of partisan politcs and towards productive conservative legislation.

The United States at its core is a conservative nation founded on Judeo-Christain values. If we, The People, take back our government, through peaceful means, by simply being involved in it; these values will be reflected in the policies established.

-----
Lord, rest the souls of the faithfully departed and give comfort and healing to the injured and the families of all involved.

JDD

What happened in 2008...

IPads come to the House Floor!

Shot down like a "lame duck"

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with Nextel Direct Connect

No more sugar-coating now...

Follow Southern Conservative

Please note the "follow" widget at the top of the sidebar. Click follow to receive a notification when the blog is updated. Please encourage your friends to view and follow the blog as well by "sharing" it using the social networking tabs (Facebook, Twitter, Digg and Google Buzz) at the end of each post.

Thanks for visiting, please come back regularly. As always, I welcome your comments. Please remember to follow the blog.

-Daniel

National Public Radio Aims to Transfer Listenership Ahead of Funding Cuts

Many of you have probably heard about National Public Radio firing Juan Williams a few weeks ago. Juan is a well spoken and thoughtful Democrat who frequently appears on Fox News. This apparent act of retribution for his involvement in Fox's programming has created a tremendous backlash against NPR with many conservatives calling for Congress to defund NPR because of thier aparent, however subtle, attack on free speech.

I was channel surfing on my FM Radio the other day when  seek button stopped on the local NPR affiliate. I had gotten tired of surfing so I gave up/ got distracted with the dial set on the local NPR affiliate. I didn't choose to put it on NPR, but that is just where it happened to be set when I gave up surfing.

The program was called "All Things Considered." You may have heard it before. It was hosted by a mild mannered apparently liberal moderator whose quiet and calming voice, I can still hear in my head. After a few minutes of not paying any attention, I somehow became aware of what was on the program, perhaps I even turned up the volume.

The show was singing (not literally) the praises of Bloomberg News and its growth in recent years. They couldn't speak highly enough about Bloomberg News and its owner, Michael Bloomberg, who also happens to be liberal democrat mayor of New York City.

They spent 20 minutes detailing the conversion Bloomberg News was undergoing, and how it was emerging as the new leader in the "hard news industry" . In truth- the "hard news industry" has been dominated, I mean dominated by Fox News in recent years and it will be a very long time before Bloomberg is able to change that, if ever.

NPR is simply trying to create the illusion among their listeners that Bloomberg is a fair and unbiased source of information the way Fox News has been for the American public in recent years. That is an absolutely rediculous assertion. The fact is that with that kind of free advertising, funded by the American public (many, if not most, of whom disagree with the agenda of Bloomberg and NPR and the rest of the socialist progressives) through NPR, any news agency would begin getting more attention.

How can we believe that a news agency being owned by politico Michael Bloomberg, would not reflect his political perspective? The fact is I have never heard them plug Fox News once. On the contrary, this program represents a promotion of a company aiming to compete with Fox. It appears to me that this is as much an act of retribution by NPR for the uprising of the people that has come about since their firing of Juan Williams for his frequent appearances on Fox News, as anything else. They know they are goign down. They want to bring Fox down with them by trying to put Bloomberg on top.

It appears that the political arm of National Public Radio sees the writing on the wall. In the coming months, they will lose their federal funding and they know it. It is with this in mind that they have chosen to use our money to tell their listeners about how great Bloomberg news is, in a prime time setting.

This is just another reason that NPR should be removed from the federal dole. It is time for congress to stop funding many, many of the agencies and departments they have been funding for years and NPR is only one of them. But there is simply no excuse for NPR receiving federal funding any longer. For years it has used its funding to promote the liberal socialist agenda. Now that we have exposed NPR for what it is, they are doing the best they can to send their listeners to Bloomberg (and other liberal media outlets, if I had to guess).

Now lets call on our faithful lawmakers in Washington and demand that they get to work with their buzzsaws cutting NPR and all of the other unecessarrys from the federal budget. It is time to down size the government, cut taxes and end this recession. There is only one way to do it and it is by using our strength to pass legislation cutting spending anywhere we can. No more pork, no more pork, NO MORE PORK! It is up to you and me to make sure this happens.

We must petition our leaders to advance the conservative agenda and pass conservative legislation. Cutting NPRs funding is just one small example of ways that we can reduce governmental spending and reduce the tax burden on he working class American families who need it most but its as good a place as any to start.

Ethics Reform- Part Deux

Tomorrow begins the historic special session on Ethics Reform in Alabama's newly elected Republican Legislature. This will be Governor Riley's last hoorah and could likely determine how he will be remembered by generations of Alabamains.

We have gone from the depths of despair and what we hope will prove to be the bottom of the recession, to a hopeful moment in the history of our state that may represent the dawning of a new day in Alabama. After 136 years of Democrat control, beginning this week we will see if our newly elected legislature is serious about cleaning up corruption, or if they are just trying to bar the door on the Democrats now that they have gotten them out of town.

The burden rests squarely on the shoulders of the GOP Leadership of the Legislature and it will be these same legislators who pay the price of failure if the first act of the Republican legislature proves to be a political stunt.

Don't get me wrong, I believe that transparency in our government is a great step in the right direction. I have read the legislation and I agree that we need to eliminate gifts from lobbyists, PAC to PAC transfers and double dipping. But I am afraid these bills fall short when it comes to addressing corruption in Montgomery and local government(s) in Alabama.

The point I am getting at is this. Double dipping is being targetted in this ethics reform effort. Double dipping is when a state representative of senator collects two state salaries, one from thier elected position, and the other is from a state agency (historically these have often been no-show, two year college positions).

Now these douple dipping arrangements are being targetted by the Republicans because it has most often been the Democrats who have benefited from these double dipping arrangements. I agree double dipping needs to be addressed, but I think that the definition of double dipping is far too narrow.

The problem I have is this: Many Republicans are guilty of double dipping, but instead of taking a second state salaried position, they are often the beneficiaries of very lucrative tax payer funded contracts, which they win with limited to no competition. This should be a crime.

When our elected leaders grant themselves unfair advantage for The People's money, I can't think of any reason that this shouldn't be considered an Ethics Violation. Any time competition is limited or non existant, simple economics dictates that the tax payers are left paying more than they should be for the goods or services procured.

Simply put: IF COMPETITION IS LIMITED, THE TAX PAYERS PAY MORE THAN THEY SHOULD HAVE TO.

There is NO REASON a state legislator or any elected official should even come close to having this conflict. There are sacrifices that must be made when one chooses to serve in elected office and yes, this may be one of those sacrifices that needs to be made. "I am sorry, Mr. Elected, No, you may not have a million dollar contract on my dime just because you have duped the electorate into voting for you."

That is like buying a car without shopping the prices. Without shopping/competition the buyer will never get a good deal. Undermining competition not only takes money from the tax payers that they should never have to pay, but taking it one step further, this sort of corruption is largely to blame for our current recession. This sort of crony capitalism is running rampant in our government from Montgomery to Washington DC, the only difference is the number of zero's in the budgets and the number of victims of this behaviour. It is also a problem in county and municipal governments.

Without this sort of crony capitalist CORRUPTION, the necessary revenue for running our government could be reduced tremendously. This means the burden on every tax paying American could be lightened substantially, putting more money into all of our pockets, which we could all use.

If the appearance of impropriety becomes apparent, it will be amply clear that those involved did not run to serve. Or at the very best, they have chosen, after being elected, to pad their pockets at the expense of those they are sworn to represent. If that is not an ethical violation, I don't know what is.

Thank you for reading Southern Conservative. Please share my blog with your friends. I welcome your feedback! Thank you!

-Daniel

Judicial Reform and Divorce in Alabama

It is high time that in addition to ethics reform, we institute some judicial reform in the State of Alabama.

For the last two years, my wife and I have been victims of our judicial system. We have been pitted against each other by lawyers and the legal system for fear of losing our children to one another. We are not alone in this either. Many, many Alabamians have been through this very same traumatic experience. Its unfortunate, it is unnecessary and perhaps most importantly: I believe it is unconstitutional.

There is no more basic instinct in the mind of a parent than his or her desire to protect his or her children. Unfortunately, this often results in disagreements between parents in how they believe the children should be raised and the values which should be instilled in them. All to often, these disagreements ultimately materialize into what is now referred to as "irreconcilable differences".

That term is the biggest crock of shit I think I have ever heard, pardon my French, but I am more than a little bit passionate about this subject matter. This way of looking at marriage, as being soluble and able to be broken for convenience sake is damaging our country and our children beyond measure. There is no such thing as "irreconcilable differences". I can say this because my marriage has reached the breaking point, been through two years of divorce trials, and I continue to pray for reconciliation with my wife.

I have realized, through prayer, that it is not all her fault, as I once believed. In fact I now realize that if I had listened to her and valued her opinion more and respected her emotions more, then our marriage may have never gotten to the broken state that it did. That being said, God can heal all things and he continues to work in my life by changing my heart and changing my relationship with my wife as he does.

I am not saying that I am solely responsible for the things that happened. I am saying that I know I played a part and I could have been a better husband. My ability to admit my faults, opens the door to change. Hopefully we are both on this road towards becoming better people. If not, that is ok, I can only be responsible for myself and I choose to love my wife, regardless of what she has done or will do, good or bad, in sickness and in health, for richer for poorer, till death. That is the marriage vow isn't it?

Last time I checked, a Marriage is a vow between Man, Wife and their God. Does Government even have a place in marriage? I don't think so. I think that the state's governance of marriages is just a way to tax the people for exercising their Religion by requiring a marriage license.

Now it has gotten to the point that the judicial system has made an even bigger business out of divorcing people, once again, when the judiciary has no place in marriage (except in upholding our right to marry, and exercise our faith by doing so). The only people who benefit from this system are the lawyers, who surprisingly enough, are the ones who wrote the laws that established this system.

These divorce lawyers foster a sentiment of distrust between the husband and wife which further prevents any sort of reconciliation. They milk their clients until they cannot pay another cent. They manipulate the party's fear and turn them against each other in such a way that makes reconciliation all but impossible. They even go so far as to encourage the parties to make allegations against each other and foster conflict that can be damaging to their clients and their families for the rest of their lives.

They do this to their benefit and at the expense of countless defenseless children, whose parents have been pitted against each other in court rooms where they stand to lose what is most important to them, their children, so they feel they have no option, but to fight.

I believe it is time for the conservatives among us, to stand up to this government who has gotten out of control and is interfering with our lives and injecting itself into our religious practices, where it has no place. We must put conservative judges on the bench. I mean real conservative judges who will stand up for and protect the religious nature of marriage, not just cover their asses by letting these trials drag on and on and on, benefiting no one but the lawyers who put them in office.

For that matter, I think we should put more regular folks on the bench and into elected office. I don't think we need lawyers writing our laws anymore because historically the laws they have written have protected the members of their trade, more than the rest of us. That isn't right.

One shouldn't have to be a lawyer to be a judge or to hold any office. He should have demonstrated a commitment to justice, a sound mind and values in line with those of The People (all which can be determined by the electorate) but being a lawyer shouldn't be a requirement. The point I am getting at is this: let's put regular folks on the bench into elected office. They'll look out for the regular folks through their ruling and their governing. Allowing our state and our judiciary to be run by lawyers has only benefited one group of people: lawyers.

If you must hire a lawyer, find one or research several divorce attorneys at http://www.attorneys.com/divorce attorneys.

Ethics Reform in Montgomery

Governor Riley has called for a special session of the Alabama Legislature to address "Ethics Reform". I think this is a great step in the right direction, but we need to make sure it goes far enough.

So far most of the items initended to be addressed pertain to lobbyists and campaign finance reform/ PAC to PAC transfers. These are definitely things that need to be addressed.

It has also been said that they intend to address "double dipping". That is good too. What I have not heard is anything about prohibiting elected officials from gaining unfair advantage to government funded CONTRACTS.

The contracts let by the state and local govenrment represent a large portion of government spending. More often than we'd like to admit, state officials wind up recieving or benefitting from these contracts. This is a different kind of double dipping, but is double dipping none the less. If they are circumventing or undermining fair competition, the tax-payers pick up the tab for the difference and that is unacceptable. It is time for it to stop.

That being said this session on Ethics Reform needs to address this situation as well as those already planned to be addressed. There is no reason an elected official or any company he or she works for in any way , or owns an interest in, should be performing tax payer funded work, without total transparency and fair competition. This is true during thier term of service as well as after thier terms have expired or they have been removed from office and it should apply to local officials just as much as those at the state level.

I know of too many instances where someone has been elected, served a term or two and has been set for life because they were able to arrange a contract for themselves after leaving office or even while still in office, all at the expense of the tax payers, whom they were sworn to represent. Now THAT is an Ethics violation and we don't need any commission to tell us so. Every human is blessed with a consience and naturally we know right from wrong. that being said, I think making every elected Joe take an ethics class is another waste of our money. People know when they are doing something wrong. Write the rules and if someone violates them, let them pay.

If the newly elected Republican Legislature doesn't address this issue of contracts being funnelled to friends and allies of the elected officials (and even the officials themselves) in its "Ethics Reform" session, we will know right off the bat that these guys are not really serious about cleaning up corruption and special interests in Mongomery. They are only serious about cleaning out thier competition for public money so that there is more to go around for them and thier cronies.
 
I hope that we have elected men of character who will do the right thing and address ALL of the corruption in Montgomery, not just that which exists on the other side of the aisle.

Julian Assange and WikiLeaks Lay Waste to US Diplomatic Efforts

What are we going to do with this guy!? Julian Assange and his WikiLeaks website continue to undermine the interests of the United States by exposing thousands of our classified documents to the world. Simply put: if these documents were meant to be seen by the public, they wouldn't be classified.

Let me get this straight, we invest billions of our dollars and God-knows how many American lives in diplomacy, establishing and strengthening our intersts worldwide, and we are going to let this Assange character undermine it all!?! That seems assanine.

How does he get access to this information? Either somebody is disclosing it to him, or he is hacking our computers. If the former is true: we should find these people, strip them of thier rank and throw them in jail for treason! If its the latter: one would think with the immense technological expertise of the FBI, CIA, Homeland Security and numerous other federal buracracies, someone could either trace the hacker, or secure our computers. Why are these things not happening?

The last quote I heard prior to the most recent leak was that by leaking this next group of documents, Assange "would have blood on his hands." Does that not make him an enemy of the state and worthy of his very own CIA operative? Can we not track him down and destroy his website? If these things are not possible I think he should be made the victim of an untimely "accident".

I know the mighty United States of America must have the resources to deal with such a problem. The fact that we aren't dealing with it properly leads me to one conclusion, however trite or cliche' as it may sound:
The Commander in Chief doesn't have the best interest of our country at heart. He doesn't have the best interest of us, the tax-paying People of the United States at heart. He wants to "level the playing field" between the United States and other nations and will do so by wasting billions of our hard earned dollars on diplomacy that will now prove to have been all for naught. These are dollars earned while away from our wives and children working to provide for our families.

Every dollar he wastes takes food off of a table and a mother or father out of a home. These dollars don't come for free. They must be earned. They are earned by parents who work jobs to provide for thier families. By working they are taken out of thier homes and away from their children, who greatly need thier influence. Oh but it gets better. The more he wastes, the more time mommy and daddy are away from thier children. Thus leaving the children to be raised by the television and other liberal media influences, influencing the development of our children's generation and indoctirinating them through liberal media and pop culture influence. Maybe this is why he is wasting our money.

All of that being said, it is time for us, the AMERICAN PEOPLE, to stand up and get motivated. For the sake of our children and thier children, we must fight against the liberalization of America. We must take up our political signs and stickers and put a CONSERVATIVE President in the Whitehouse in 2012. A conservative president would not tolerate Julian Assange undermining this country.

I hope that the president we have now will put an end to this Assange's actions very soon (one way or another). The United States can not afford for its diplomatic efforts to be wasted and we should not tolerate American lives being placed in peril because of this man's actions, and beginning today we should do whatever is necessarry to prevent it from happening again.

Countering Communism

It has concerned me lately to observe the spread of communism. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, we have seen marxist/communist doctrine now spread through Europe and over the Atlantic to the United States, to the very nation that liberated Europe from the grips of communist Germany.

I find it very interesting to observe the difference in foreign policy, with respect to the Berlin Wall and The Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) between North and South Korea. Since the fall of The Berlin Wall, communism has spread West. On the other hand, The DMZ (which is still in place today) has effectively contained Communism on the North side of it, allowing South Korea's free market economy to grow robustly in the last 50 years under capitalist system, bringing those Koreans fortunate enough to live in the Southern half of the country from the depths of poverty to a per capita income and a quality of life on par with ours here in the United States.

On the other side of the token, communism has been allowed to fester, unchecked, in North Korea and we now have a communist regime nearing the point of developing long range nuclear weapons. This is a very dangerous situation as without an open dialogue with North Korea, we do not and will not know thier intentions for those weapons and could very possibly find that there is a nuclear standoff and ultimately nulear warfare between North and South Korea, inevitably involving the United States and likely involving Russia and China on the side of North Korea.

All of this being said, I think it would be in our best interest to focus our diplomatic efforts on building relationships and dialogue between North and South Korea, with the ultimate goal being the removal of the DMZ. It is far to risky to continue to ignore the growing nuclear threat that is North Korea.
Ronald Reagan, in his infinite wisdom, knew that communism, isolated and allowed to grow without dialogue with the capitalist world would become a threat too dangerous to ignore. For this reason, he demanded that Mikhail Gorbechev "Tear Down This Wall." What wisdom and courage it must have taken to make such a demand! He knew that it had to happen. Unfortunately, there was an unintended consequence of the fall of the Berlin Wall and that is the spread of marxist ideology into Europe and ultimately into the United States.

Now that we know what has happened as a result of the fall of the Berlin wall, we must counter the spread of communism with conservative capitalist policy that will help the marxists who are promoting communist doctrine to understand that capitalism is the only way forward to a peaceful, just and prosperous future for America and the rest of the world. Communism ALWAYS results in abuses of the powers of government, taking of God given freedoms and often genocide and ethnic cleansing. We must stand up to the growth of government that leads us down this dangerous road.

I would propose a foriegn policy of open dialogue with the Eastern world and a domestic policy of fierce conservatism. Cutting govenrment spending by large percentages will bring this nation back to the prosperity that we once enjoyed. We should strive to remove the DMZ so that the North Koreans being kept in the darkness of communism, religious intolerance and poverty will have a chance to see that there is a better way.

Tuesday, November 2nd, I ask that you stand with me in promoting these policies by electing the conservative candidates on the ballot wherever you will be voting. After that I challenge you to speak to them regularly and demand that they govern by the will of the people. The people right now are asking for smaller government, more liberty, lower taxes and a return to prosperity. If we elect conservatives in this election and in those in the future, we will see our country turn back in the right direction. We will see our country revert to the policies that made America great. Finally and perhaps most importantly, the communist nations that remain in this world will take note and see the benefits of capitalism (freedom) and follow suit.

God Bless,
Daniel Dyas

Proposed Resolution for Pro Life and Term Limiting Constitutional Reform

As Introduced




###th General Assembly

Regular Session

2010-2011

S.R.###





Sponsored by:

Cosponsors:



________________________________________

A JOINT RESOLUTION

Applying to the Congress of the United States pursuant to Article V of the United States Constitution to call a constitutional convention for proposing amendments.





BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA:



WHEREAS, The People of Alabama believe that The United States is a Country established by our Founding Fathers firmly on Judeo-Christian Principals; and



WHEREAS, The People of Alabama believe that Life begins at conception and All Human Life should be acknowledged and protected as being sacred beginning at the moment of conception and continuing on until the moment of natural, unassisted death; and



WHEREAS, The United States Congress has proven itself to be controlled to a large degree by “Special Interests” whose interests are not necessarily the same as those of the States or those of the American people; and



WHEREAS, The number of consecutive terms served by United States Senators and Members of the United States House of Representatives is not currently limited by the Constitution of The United States; and



WHEREAS, The People of Alabama feel strongly that the unlimited number of terms able to be served by United States Senators and members of the United States House of Representatives is detrimental to The People of Alabama and The People of The United States; and



WHEREAS, With each passing year, this nation becomes more deeply in debt as its expenditures exceed available revenues; and





WHEREAS, Fiscal prudence requires that certain steps be taken to control the growth of the budget and eliminate excessive deficits; and



WHEREAS, Article V of the United States Constitution requires the United States Congress to call a constitutional convention upon the application of two-thirds of the legislatures of the several states for the purpose of proposing amendments to the United States Constitution; now therefore be it



RESOLVED, That the Legislature of the State of Alabama, pursuant to Article V of the United States Constitution, hereby applies to the Congress to call a constitutional convention for the purpose of proposing to the states for ratification, amendments to the United States Constitution containing the following provisions:



First, the amendment(s) shall acknowledge that The United States is a Nation founded on Judeo-Christian principals and shall insure that The People’s God-given Right to practice these beliefs shall not be infringed.



Second, The amendment(s) shall acknowledge that All Human Life is sacred and shall be protected from the moment of conception to the moment of natural death.



Third, the amendment(s) shall establish term limits for the members of The United States Senate and The United States House of Representatives.



Fourth, the amendment(s) shall require the President to submit and the Congress to adopt only balanced budgets for all federal programs and agencies, except in times of war, in which case such deficit spending shall be strictly and unquestionably “War-Related”.



Fifth, the amendment(s) shall grant the President the authority to disapprove any item or items in any bill presented by the Congress to the President in addition to the President's authority to disapprove entire bills pursuant to Article I, Section 7 of the United States Constitution.



Sixth, the amendment(s) shall require the President to submit and the Congress to adopt budgets for all federal programs and agencies on a biennial rather than annual basis; and be it further



RESOLVED, That this application constitutes a continuing application in accordance with Article V of the United States Constitution until at least two-thirds of the legislatures of the several states have made application for a constitutional convention or the Congress has proposed amendment(s) to the United States Constitution equivalent to the amendment(s) proposed in this resolution; and be it further



RESOLVED, That, if the convention called by the Congress is not limited in subject to the amendment proposed in this resolution, any delegates, representatives, or participants from the State of Alabama asked to participate in the convention are permitted to debate and vote only on the proposed amendment(s) contained within this resolution or an equivalent amendment; and be it further



RESOLVED, That if two-thirds of the legislatures of the several states make application to the Congress to call a constitutional convention, the State of Alabama demands that such a convention be called not later than six months after the Congress receives the thirty-fourth application from a state legislature; and be it further



RESOLVED, That the Clerk of the House of Representatives transmit duly authenticated copies of this resolution to the Speaker and Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, the President Pro Tempore and Secretary of the United States Senate, the members of the Alabama Congressional delegation, the presiding officer of each house of each state legislature in the United States, and the news media of Alabama.

Constitutional Convention to Adopt Term Limits and End Abortion

Our Founding Fathers were some of the greatest heros in the history of mankind. Thier courage and wisdom never ceases to amaze me. I am inspired by thier willingness to stand up to tyranny and injustice against all odds and sacrifice everything they had for the future of this country. To put it in thier words "With a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our Sacred Honor."

Lately I have been doing alot of constitutional research and seeking to understand what our Founding Fathers would do if they found our nation in the position it is in today. My research in the past few weeks has brought me to some very encouraging conclusions regarding two things in particular: Term Limits and Ending Abortion. I know they may seem fairly unrelated, but they are similar in a way. These are two things that The People of our country are demanding and our federal governmet has here-to-for refused to abide by the wishes of The People.

We, The People, can change that through our state governments by calling for a Constitutional Convention and proposing amendments to The United States Constitution requiring term limits on congress and recognizing the sanctity of and protecting unborn human life.

It is time for The People of this country to take back control of our country and the individual states have the power and the ability to do so. It is for this reason that our Founding Fathers (God bless thier souls) had the wisdom and the foresight to give the states the right to amend The Constitution without the consent of congress.

I hereby call on my local legislative delegation, that being Senator Tripp Pittman and State Representative Joe Faust, to propose a resolution on the floor of thier respective houses, calling for a Constitutional Convention for the purpose of Enacting Term Limits on Congress and Recognizing the Sanctity of Human Life and Protecting All Americans Equally, Born and Unborn. Furthermore, I call on these leaders and The Governor of the State of Alabama, Bob Riley, to diplomatically call on our fellow State Governments to enact an identical resolution, calling for a Constitutional Convention.

It is within the power of the states to correct the problems we are facing nationally. We cannot depend on congress to fix itself. Congress will never adopt legislation, limiting its own terms. It is up to us, the states, to make that happen.

Similarly, the liberal judiciary, which has been corrupted by lifetime appointments of activist judges, will continue to allow the murder of our unborn population under the guise of "protecting a woman's right to choose". A woman doesn't have the right to choose to kill anyone but the unborn child she is carrying, why should her right to kill her unborn child be placed above the civil rights of the child itself?

It is my belief that we, The American People, do not approve of abortion. It is also a belief of mine that given the opportunity and the leadership, The States would enact Term Limits on Congress. I think these are among the most important things that our State Legislatures could be addressing at this time. For this reason: I ask that they commence to petitioning and preparing for a Constitutional Convention immediatly for these purposes.

In closing, I ask each of you who read this to contact your state legislators and ask them to propose a resolution for a Contitutional Convention, just like the one that will be proposed in Alabama, in thier respective State Legislature(s). Remind them that by doing so, under Article 5 of The United States Constitution, The States can amend The Constitution and adopt Term Limits for Congress and Recognize and Protect the Sanctity of Human Life, Born and Unborn.

-J. Daniel Dyas, Sr.- September 27, 2010

The KC45 and The Cost of Corruption

Mobile and Northrupp/EADS lost the KC 45 Tanker contract for two reasons:

1. Special interests running our government.

This is unfortunately the way our government works today. It must be changed. It is the cause of immense amounts of wasteful spending at all levels of government and we cannot allow it to persist. It results in higher taxes for all Americans and has countless other detrimental effects- not to mention an injustice like the loss of a $30 billion dollar contract.

Special interests gain a position in our government in several ways, but there are two that are particularly powerful. (1) Campaign contributions and (2) Lobbying.

Often corporations or PACs (Political Action Commitees) giv compaign funds to candidates. There is nothing wrong with supporting a candidate, of course. Unfortunately when a corporation an individual or PAC goves large amounts of money to a candidate for office, they often expect, and naturally the candidate feels obliged to grant them, special treatment in return. This is when the problem comes about. Whether we are talking about a company getting favorable treatment on a contract decision or an unnecessary appropriation or grant the result is still the same inequity for the tax payer- in other words: wasted tax money or pork spending, as we sometimes call it.

The truth is, it is great to support a candidate. But it should only be because you support what the candidate proposes to stand for when elected. It should not involve any expectation of quid pro quo, but unfortunately as with any investment, people naturally expect a return. In reality, once elected, the office holder should give every person in his district the same priority regardless of age, race, gender, financial status or whether or not they gave to his campaign. This rarely happens and this is why we have pork spending and inequities in government.

That being the case, it is important to educate yourself on who is funding a candidates campaign before deciding to vote for them. There is often more to the story than meets the eye.

Lobbying is also a problem. We have lobbyists circling every governmental building in the USA waiting to catch an elected official and take him to lunch or out for a round of golf so they can bend his ear, twist his arm and try to get him to do what they want him to do. These lobbyists rarely have the best interests of ALL people in mind, but they are looking out for a small group of people (this is called a "special interest group"). We have to stop letting these special interest groups run our government. In order to do so, we must reform campaign finance policy and we must restrict lobbying of our congress. I heard somebody say one "Lobbyists are like prostitutes" I dont necessarrily disagree. His opinion was that we should treat them as such with respect to the law and make it illegal for anyone to be paid to lobby. I thin this would solve the problem greatly.


2. Apparently, our folks in Washington are not doing their jobs.

Now the tax payers will get a raw deal, the war fighters will get second rate equipment and once again South Alabama will become the victim of a political vendetta inflicted by the democrats. First, Johnson shut down Brookley, now its Obama making sure that we don't win what would be one of the most important contracts to ever be let by the federal government. Anybody with any sense will vote against those bastards from this point forward. At this point it should be painfully clear (for a number of reasons) that they are not concerned with justice, but with forcing thier liberal ideology upon us.

It is the responsibility of our leadership in Washington to make sure we are treated equitably by the federal government and to have a contract of this magnitude snatched from our hands by the Chigago based politcal mob that is hijacking our country is simply an inexcusable failure on behalf of our congressional delegation. Last time I checked our storied Senator Richard Shelby was on the Senate Armed Services Committee. One would think, he could make this happen, but apparently he is preoccupied passing pork to put up building with his name on them all over the state. Even the European leadership is crying foul (not that I put much stock in their opinions usually)! Come on! They can see, from the other side of the world that Boeing and Obama are colluding to steal this contract and force an inferior aircraft upon the American Warfighter and the the American Taxpayer. Meanwhile the rest of the America isn't even paying any attention. Jo Bonner, Artur Davis, Richard Shelby and Jeff Sessions and all the rest of them should be on Fox News, MSNBC, CBS (not that anyone watches those last two) and every other network telling the country about this. This is the clearest example of corruption yet!

It simply amazes me how many people will stand by and watch corruption persist in this country. It happens from the local Government here in Baldwin County all the way to Capitol Hill. Meanwhile, those who are elected to enforce the law and prevent that sort of corruption simply stand aside and watch it go on. Hey everybody (elected law enforcement officials- AGs and DAs), do you not know how much corruption costs us taxpayers? If you don't then you should. If you do then you should be doing something about it. Even if you are not able to convict the the perpitrator, you should try your damndest! These folks should be scared to even try to pass unconstitutional legislation. They should be scared to try to collude on the award of a contract. They should be getting indited for doing so. Where are the leaders with the spine to stand up to injustice? Martin Luther King was one of those leaders. I don't know that we have had one since. We need leadership. Leadership that is unafraid to stand for what is right and what is just. Unfortunately, while I fundamentally disagree with the democrats on what I believe is right and just, I still see them as having more leadership at this point in time. Because they are committed to accomplishing what they set out to accomplish and that is the continued socialization of our country until ultimately all industry is socialized and we are a communist nation.

I strive to be a leader who will challenge the liberal agenda on conservative principal. I will fight the tyranny that they are inflicting upon us to my dying day and I will not stand aside and quietly tolerate injustice and inequity! I will stand for Life and I will stand for Justice. I will begin at the Baldwin County Commission and we, here is Baldwin County, will show the rest of the country what it means to be conservative. In doing so, we will reap the benefits of conservatism. Our economy will be stronger than those in other areas, our businesses will succeed and our people will have opportunity. We must return our local government to Conservative principals for our economy to stand a chance of survival. There is not a recovery going on. I know it because I see what is happening. The new year always brings with it a surge of new activity. This year the surge is substantially more mild than it has been in years past. All of the new jobs are being created in government and for every government job created there are two lost in the private sector. We must get back to conservatism and get back to it fast. If we don't our businesses will continue to fail, our jobs will continue to be lost, our homes to be foreclosed and our futures to grow more bleak.

Elect me to the Baldwin County Commission. I will be a strong voice for conservative principals. I will not tolerate corruption or special interests and I will expose them every time I get an opportunity. I will be YOUR voice on the Baldwin County Commission and I will always remember that it is supposed to be: "the Government of the People, by the People and for The People!" we need leaders who remember this, understand what it takes and have the courage and fortitude to stand up for our beliefs.

I am running for you, for your wife and your children, for your Mom and your Dad and your Aunts and Uncles. That is what I mean when I say "for The People". I am running for office to stand up for what WE believe in. Please vote for me June 1. Spread the word. Contribute any amount to the campaign (so long as it is less than $1000). Every contribution makes a major difference. Please visit my website www.DanielDyas.com and make a paypal contribution to the campaign. Help me win and let me be your voice in the County Government!

Thank you for reading this post, I welcome your feedback!

God bless you and your family,
Daniel Dyas

PS Find me on Facebook and Twitter

The Real Path to Effective Health Care Reform

Daniel,

I am a conservative with a question. Can you explain to me the detriment that universal health care would present to us as a country. My question comes on the heels of the documentary "Sicko". I am willing to admit that it is just a movie from a man with an agenda. However Mr. Moore does, in my opinion, bring up some good points. Particularly with the health care/taxes that Parisians experience. I understand that this is a very complicated question. An email with extreme brevity would be understandable and appreciated.

Thanks

Travis Chandler
Plano, Texas


Travis,

Let me respond to your question with three points:

1. If you are truly a Conservative, as you have said, then you will agree most things that grow government are bad for our country. The government should definitely not be involved when people make decisions about their health and how to care for it. That is a decision to be made between a doctor and a patient. Its as simple as that.

2. We cannot afford it. Our national debt continues to balloon and if we don't reign in spending, we will in real trouble fiscally. There will be no choice but for government to raise taxes on the middle class, not to mention the buying power of our American dollar will continue to weaken.

3. A government takeover of health care will prevent the REAL reforms that we really do need!

(Once again, a list of three)

1. We need to offer a tax credit to Americans who maintain healthy lifestyles (an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure)

2. We need interstate competition in the insurance markets, this will bring down cost and make insurance affordable for even more Americans (if they choose to buy it).

3. We need tort reform. Capping damages on medical liability suits would prevent the excessive prescriptions and procedures being promoted by docs today, because they would not be constantly under the threat of multi-million dollar suits, not to mention it would reduce the amount of insurance they would have to buy, the cost of which is ultimately passed to the consumer.

Thanks for the question, Travis. Conservatives have the best solutions to the health care situation and nationalizing the whole system is definitely not the answer. It will be too expensive, it will have major costs in terms of the quality of care provided, and ultimately it will not even solve any of our problems. Conservative solutions (like the three I just gave you) will.
I hope I was able to answer your question successfully and I hope you agree.

Cheers,
Daniel Dyas